|
Speed: Oh How
We Love It!
Fast cars, fast
computers, fast wide receivers, any kind of
fast-action......we love it. And when it comes to our
archery equipment, it's no different. Show most guys a
brand new bow, and their first question is likely to be "How
fast does it shoot?". Right or wrong, speed is a major
consideration for most archers. And it's great to see how
advancements in materials and design technologies have made
today's compound bows better, faster, and more fun to shoot
than ever before.
Of course, there will always be a few dissenters in the
crowd, those who'll loftily claim they don't care about
speed. But the market trends don't lie. Archery consumers
are taking advantage of these innovations, buying
high-performance bows and speed-boosting gadgets by the
trainload. And nothing yields such a predictable and
significant increase in speed like a good set of lightweight
carbon arrows. So let's examine the pro's and con's to
shooting lightweight arrows. Let's find out where they
help, where they hurt, and where they don't really make a
difference.
ARROW MASS
AFFECTS ARROW VELOCITY
When
all other variables are constant, arrow speed has an inverse
relationship with arrow mass. Of course there is a point of
diminishing returns, but as arrow mass increases, arrow
speed decreases. As arrow mass decreases, arrow speed
increases. As we learned in Chapter 2, there is a limit to
how light you should go, so it is possible to have too much
of a good thing. But the informed archer can greatly
improve his bow's performance by upgrading to modern
carbon/graphite arrow designs. How much performance can be
gained? We put the issue to the test.
ARROW MASS VS. ARROW VELOCITY TEST
We prepared 9 arrows, ranging from 250 grains up to 650
grains in precisely 50 grain increments. Each arrow was
fired from our test bow (60#/28" Bowtech Patriot) through
the chronograph and the results were recorded (table below).
Five trials were conducted for each arrow - to achieve a
reliable speed measurement (average). Each arrow was fired
from the same distance, from the same shooter, and without
any modifications to the bow's settings during the test. The
test was conducted at our indoor range, where lighting and
environmental conditions could be held constant throughout
our test.
|
Our
Test Results - Chronograph (speed) Test |
|
FPS |
Trial
1 |
Trial
2 |
Trial
3 |
Trial
4 |
Trial
5 |
Average |
 |
|
250gr
Arrow |
4.17
gr/lb. |
294 |
294 |
295 |
294 |
294 |
294.2 FPS |
|
300gr
Arrow |
5.00
gr/lb. |
274 |
272 |
273 |
273 |
273 |
273.0 FPS |
|
350gr
Arrow |
5.83gr/lb. |
256 |
256 |
257 |
255 |
256 |
256.0 FPS |
|
400gr
Arrow |
6.67gr/lb. |
242 |
242 |
242 |
243 |
242 |
242.2 FPS |
|
450gr
Arrow |
7.50
gr/lb. |
231 |
231 |
231 |
230 |
231 |
230.8 FPS |
|
500gr
Arrow |
8.33
gr/lb. |
220 |
219 |
220 |
220 |
219 |
219.6 FPS |
|
550gr
Arrow |
9.17
gr/lb. |
211 |
210 |
209 |
210 |
209 |
209.8 FPS |
|
600gr
Arrow |
10.00
gr/lb. |
202 |
201 |
201 |
202 |
202 |
201.6 FPS |
|
650gr
Arrow |
10.83
gr/lb. |
196 |
195 |
195 |
195 |
194 |
195.0 FPS |
OK. BUT IS
FASTER NECESSARILY BETTER?
Maybe.
From a standpoint of accuracy, you may find that lightweight
arrows will yield some surprising benefits. From the moment
your arrow is released from the bow, it begins to lose
trajectory. As it succumbs to the effects of gravity and air
resistance, it's flight path (trajectory) changes and the
arrow eventually begins to drop back to earth. Arrows which
fly more quickly hold their trajectory better than slower
arrows. So archers who shoot lighter-faster arrows will have
less need to adjust for distance - since the faster arrows
will hold a "flatter" trajectory within a given distance. In
effect, the faster arrow allows you to make more mistakes in
yardage estimation. If you mis-estimate a deer to be 25
yards away, and it is actually 30 yards away, a fast arrow
"misses" it's mark by a much smaller margin. Look at the
trajectory chart on the right from our Bowtech Patriot
experiment. The heavier arrows nosedive much more quickly
than the lighter faster arrows. So whether you're a hunter
or competition 3D shooter, you may find that faster arrows
actually add a little forgiveness into your shooting,
allowing you to make an error in yardage estimation without
paying such a heavy price.
Hunters may also find that a faster arrow gives game animals
less opportunity move out of position. When you fire an
arrow at a game animal, the sound of the bow travels much
faster (about 1100 fps) than the arrow. So the game animal
will certainly hear the sound of the bow before the arrow
arrives. During that time, the animal has a brief
opportunity to lunge, jump, squat, or otherwise get out of
the way. For example, an alarmed deer will often "crouch"
in preparation to jump. This crouching motion makes it
appear the deer has attempted to "duck" the arrow, when in
fact the deer is just loading it's muscles to jump and
flee. As a result, many bowhunters tend to miss high,
shooting the arrow over the deer's back or impacting above
the kill-zone, resulting in an unfortunate wound. Of
course, there are several factors that come into play (the
alertness and athleticism of the deer, your distance and
angle from the target, the amount of noise from your bow,
etc.) which can affect how quickly a deer responds to the
sound of your shot. But one thing is for sure. The faster
your arrow arrives at the target, the less time the deer
will have to react. So let's take a look at how quickly an
arrow traverses it's flight path, given a known distance and
launch speed.
|
Approximate Time to Arrow Impact (Seconds) |
|
 |
Distance---> |
10 Yards |
20 Yards |
30 Yards |
40 Yards |
50 yards |
|
150 fps |
0.203 |
0.412 |
0.628 |
0.849 |
1.078 |
|
175 fps |
0.174 |
0.353 |
0.538 |
0.728 |
0.924 |
|
200 fps |
0.152 |
0.309 |
0.471 |
0.637 |
0.808 |
|
225 fps |
0.135 |
0.275 |
0.418 |
0.566 |
0.718 |
|
250 fps |
0.122 |
0.247 |
0.377 |
0.510 |
0.647 |
|
275 fps |
0.111 |
0.225 |
0.342 |
0.463 |
0.588 |
|
300 fps |
0.102 |
0.206 |
0.314 |
0.425 |
0.539 |
|
325 fps |
0.094 |
0.190 |
0.290 |
0.392 |
0.497 |
| |
Assumes a 3% Loss of
Velocity Every 10 Yards of Flight Due to
Friction/Air Resistance |
So it seems to
be a simple choice. For the best possible performance, we
just need to shoot the lightest arrow possible, right? In
most situations, yes. But there's some other things to
consider. Most everything in archery is a trade-off; you
have to give up some of this in order to get some of that.
The issue of arrow weight and speed is no different.
Shooting an ultra-light arrow will indeed give you
eye-popping speed, but at some expense.
THE NEG:
MORE SPEED = MORE
NOISE
First, shooting a lightweight arrow may result in a notable
increase in noise from your bow. It's to be expected, as
the faster moving string makes a bigger disturbance in the
surrounding air. If you shoot a high-quality bow that's
already pretty quiet, the difference may be subtle. But if
your bow is already noisy even when shooting your
heavyweight aluminum arrows, shooting ultra-light carbon
arrows will guarantee you a virtual harmonic train-wreck
with every shot. String silencers, Limb Savers™, and a good
high quality stabilizer will all help, but be advised that
added speed will typically come with some added noise too.
If you're a hunter, noise is an important issue. But if
you're a competition or recreational shooter, noise isn't
such a serious issue.
THE BIG NEG: LOSS OF
KINETIC ENERGY
How much penetration, or knock-down power, your arrows will
have is a matter of kinetic energy. Arrows which impact the
target with more kinetic energy will penetrate the target
more deeply than arrows with less kinetic energy. Kinetic
energy is the energy of motion. Any object which has motion
has kinetic energy. Total kinetic energy depends upon two
variables: the mass of the object and the speed of the
object. And here's where the trade-off comes in. A bow is
generally more efficient, when launching a heavier arrow.
So mathematically, shooting lightweight carbon arrows will
cost you a little
Kinetic Energy (penetration) at the target. To
illustrate the point, we've converted our Bowtech Patriot
experiment from FPS into Kinetic Energy. Look at the
results.
|
FT-POUNDS |
Trial 1 |
Trial 2 |
Trial 3 |
Trial 4 |
Trial 5 |
Average |
 |
|
250gr
Arrow |
47.99 |
47.99 |
48.32 |
47.99 |
47.99 |
48.06 ft-lbs |
|
300gr
Arrow |
50.02 |
49.30 |
49.66 |
49.66 |
49.66 |
49.66 ft-lbs |
|
350gr
Arrow |
50.95 |
50.95 |
51.34 |
50.55 |
50.95 |
50.95 ft-lbs |
|
400gr
Arrow |
52.03 |
52.03 |
52.03 |
52.46 |
52.03 |
52.12 ft.lbs |
|
450gr
Arrow |
53.33 |
53.33 |
53.33 |
52.87 |
53.33 |
53.24 ft-lbs |
|
500gr
Arrow |
53.75 |
53.26 |
53.75 |
53.75 |
53.26 |
53.55 ft-lbs |
|
550gr
Arrow |
54.39 |
53.87 |
53.36 |
53.87 |
53.36 |
53.77 ft-lbs |
|
600gr
Arrow |
54.38 |
53.84 |
53.84 |
54.38 |
54.38 |
54.16 ft-lbs |
|
650gr
Arrow |
55.46 |
54.90 |
54.90 |
54.90 |
54.33 |
54.90 ft-lbs |
As you can see,
the heavier arrows manage more kinetic energy, or "knock
down" power. But to gain just 4-6 ft-lbs of KE, you'll have
to sacrifice perhaps 100 fps of your arrow velocity. Of
course, every bow will not perform exactly as our test bow
did. However, you can expect similar gains and losses in
performance with most modern compound bow models. So this
will be another trade-off to consider when ordering your
arrows. If you're a hunter, penetration is an important
issue. But if you're solely a competition or recreational
shooter, don't give penetration another thought.
This issue of KE is a major hot-topic of debate among
bowhunters. Some hunters setup their rigs to produce
maximum speed, some want maximum KE, and others choose
something in the middle. Again, there may not be a right
and wrong here. Every hunter seems to have his own opinions
on the proper techniques and ethics of big game bowhunting.
So with regards to lightweight hunting arrows and the
real-world effect of the subsequent loss of Kinetic Energy,
the following perspective might help.
SOME PERSPECTIVE:
It should be noted that a properly placed arrow - impacting
with 50 ft-lbs of KE would easily generate a clean pass-thru
on large game like Whitetail Deer or Elk (as in our
experiment with the Patriot above). So with respect to
kinetic energy and big-game hunting, there really is no
practical difference between the 300 grain arrow impacting
with 50 ft-lbs of KE and a 600 grain arrow impacting with 54
ft-lbs. Either would make a clean harvest on big game. So
in most cases, the effective difference would really be
how far the arrow sticks in the dirt after passing
through the animal.
If you shoot a
modern compound bow with at least 55# of draw weight, we
suggest you not split too many hairs over the issue of KE.
If you do your job and place the shot properly, you'll have
plenty of KE to make a quick humane harvest. If you shoot
mechanical broadheads, or you hunt "thick-skinned" animals
like hogs, bear, or buffalo, some additional Kinetic Energy
may be in order.
|